Former President Trump expressed his belief that his recent address at the United Nations General Assembly was deliberately undermined by three significant malfunctions. He took to social media to declare that the incidents, involving a stalled escalator, a non-functional teleprompter, and an inadequate sound system, were not mere coincidences but acts of \"triple sabotage.\" Trump's assertion suggests a deliberate effort to disrupt his presentation, leading to his strong condemnation of the U.N.'s operational integrity.
The series of unfortunate events commenced with an escalator incident as former President Trump and the First Lady arrived at the U.N. headquarters. The escalator abruptly ceased movement shortly after they stepped on, leaving them momentarily stranded. Footage of this incident, humorously dubbed \"Escalatorgate\" by some, captured the couple completing their ascent on foot. Despite initially making light of the situation, Trump later characterized it as an intentional act of sabotage, demanding a thorough investigation.
Upon reaching the podium, President Trump encountered a non-operational teleprompter. While he initially joked about the mishap, he proceeded to deliver a lengthy address. During his speech, he reiterated his long-standing criticisms of the United Nations, touching upon issues such as climate change and global migration. Despite the technical difficulties, he later reflected on the speech's reception, noting that the challenges might have inadvertently made his delivery more engaging.
In response to the escalating accusations, the United Nations launched an investigation into the escalator incident. U.N. officials clarified that the stoppage was most likely accidental. According to their findings, a videographer from the U.S. delegation, filming the presidential couple's arrival, inadvertently activated a safety mechanism at the top of the escalator. This mechanism, designed to prevent accidents, caused the escalator to halt, a conclusion supported by the machine's central processing unit data.
The U.N. assigned responsibility for the teleprompter's operation to the U.S. delegation, directing further inquiries to the White House. The White House, in turn, stated that U.N. staff had prevented their team from setting up the teleprompter as agreed, forcing them to improvise during the speech. Furthermore, claims surfaced about the sound system, with observations that the audio level for President Trump's speech was unusually low. However, the U.N. explained this by noting the system's design for multilingual translation via earpieces, suggesting that direct audience sound might naturally be softer.
Despite the U.N.'s explanations, White House officials continued to emphasize the narrative of deliberate sabotage. The press secretary publicly suggested that U.N. staff might have intentionally caused the escalator to stop. This perspective was fueled by past anecdotes and the U.N.'s ongoing financial struggles, which have led to cost-cutting measures, including intermittently shutting down escalators and elevators. U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz echoed these concerns, demanding a comprehensive explanation for all malfunctions and robust preventative measures. These events underscore a period of significant tension and distrust between the U.S. and the international body.