During a recent press briefing, the former President shed light on the intricacies of AI chip transactions with China. He pointed out that certain chips, such as the H20, are considered outdated, with China already possessing similar capabilities under different names. This observation frames the backdrop for ongoing negotiations, emphasizing that current deals often involve technology that is not at the forefront of innovation.
\nShifting focus to more advanced hardware, the former President specifically mentioned Nvidia's groundbreaking Blackwell chip, describing it as exceptionally advanced and currently unmatched globally. He articulated a cautious stance on allowing unrestricted access to such cutting-edge technology, suggesting that any future agreements might involve a version of the Blackwell chip with deliberately reduced capabilities. This approach, likened to selling less advanced fighter jets to other nations, aims to safeguard technological superiority while still engaging in trade.
\nThis strategy of offering modified versions of high-end technology is not unprecedented. Nvidia has previously developed specific GPU models, like the RTX 4090D and RTX 5090D, for the Chinese market, which comply with export restrictions by having reduced AI performance. Such precedents indicate a consistent pattern in managing the dissemination of sensitive technologies, ensuring that strategic advantages are preserved.
\nEven with performance reductions, the demand for advanced AI chips like a 'de-enhanced' Blackwell in China is expected to be significant. These modified chips would still offer substantial improvements over existing alternatives, potentially curbing the illicit trade of more powerful, unrestricted versions. Reports of a burgeoning black market for high-end AI chips underscore the urgent need for regulated and strategic export policies to control the flow of critical technology.
\nThe question of what the United States would seek in return for facilitating such technology transfers remains a key element of the discussion. Historically, negotiations have involved critical resources like rare earth metals. However, the exact nature of future reciprocal agreements could vary, reflecting the dynamic and multifaceted relationship between the two global powers.