The State Pier project in New London, Connecticut, has encountered significant construction issues that may lead to substantial additional costs. Initially budgeted at approximately $90 million, the project's expenses have skyrocketed to over $300 million due to redesigns and unforeseen problems. Recently, a second area with flawed construction has been identified, raising concerns about the retaining wall and transportation corridor at the south end of the facility. Additionally, a wall on the eastern side is not meeting design specifications, further complicating the situation. The Connecticut Port Authority (CPA) is holding the construction manager, Kiewit, accountable for these issues, while Kiewit maintains its stance that it is not responsible.
Issues with the southern section of the pier have brought the project under scrutiny. The retaining wall and transportation corridor do not meet the original design standards, necessitating either re-engineering or complete reconstruction. This development has raised questions about the overall quality of the construction work. Paul Whitescarver, chairman of the CPA, explained to state lawmakers that these problems were discovered after completion, leading to discussions with Kiewit for potential solutions. The authority asserts that any additional costs should be borne by Kiewit, as they agreed to a guaranteed maximum price.
Initially, the southern end was expected to be a critical component of the pier, facilitating the shipment and assembly of large offshore wind turbine parts. However, the discovery of these flaws has cast doubt on the integrity of the entire project. Engineers are now evaluating whether the existing structures can be modified to meet specifications or if they need to be entirely rebuilt. The CPA emphasizes that the contractor must adhere to the agreed-upon price, placing the financial burden on Kiewit. This stance has led to tension between the authority and the construction firm, with Kiewit maintaining its position that it is not at fault for the encountered issues.
A new challenge has emerged on the eastern side of the pier, where the docking wall does not align correctly. According to Whitescarver, this wall is not perfectly vertical, particularly near the mudline, causing potential safety risks for ships arriving during heavy weather. The distance from the bottom of the wall does not meet the required specifications, which could lead to further complications. This issue was only identified post-completion, prompting the CPA to seek solutions from Kiewit.
The eastern wall is crucial for ensuring safe docking operations, especially for vessels carrying large offshore wind turbine components. The misalignment poses a significant risk, as ships could potentially strike the wall's bottom during rough conditions. Engineers implemented specific design specifications to prevent such incidents, but the current structure falls short of these requirements. Kiewit, the construction manager, is being asked to provide viable solutions to rectify this problem. Meanwhile, Republican lawmakers have expressed frustration with the ongoing controversies surrounding the project, highlighting the need for greater accountability and transparency in handling these issues. The escalating costs and recurring problems underscore the importance of addressing these challenges promptly to ensure the successful completion of the State Pier project.