In a recent interview, SEC Commissioner Greg Sankey expressed disappointment over the cancellation of two prominent football matchups involving SEC teams. He believes that these cancellations may be linked to the influence of the College Football Playoff (CFP) selection committee. The commissioner highlighted how Nebraska's decision to cancel its series with Tennessee, as well as Wake Forest’s sudden withdrawal from a match with Ole Miss, reflects a broader trend in college football scheduling. Sankey emphasized that while such games could have been beneficial for the sport, concerns about CFP implications seem to be driving decisions. This shift in priorities has led to fewer high-profile non-conference games, which Sankey regrets but understands given the current landscape of college football.

The Impact of Cancellation Decisions on College Football

Sankey lamented the loss of significant inter-conference rivalries due to recent scheduling changes. These cancellations highlight an evolving dynamic where schools prioritize potential playoff considerations over traditional matchups. The commissioner pointed out that Nebraska’s choice to back out of its scheduled games with Tennessee was influenced by discussions with CFP insiders, who suggested that skipping these contests wouldn’t harm their playoff prospects. This revelation underscores a growing concern that the CFP process might discourage teams from playing challenging opponents outside their conferences.

Historically, teams were encouraged to bolster their strength of schedule by facing tougher competition. However, according to Sankey, Nebraska received signals indicating that avoiding these games wouldn't negatively impact their chances of making the playoffs. This perspective challenges conventional wisdom and raises questions about the future of non-conference play. Sankey stressed the importance of maintaining prestigious matchups like those between Nebraska and Tennessee, which would benefit the sport by showcasing classic programs at iconic venues. Despite this preference, he acknowledged the reality that CFP considerations significantly influence scheduling decisions.

Shifting Priorities in Scheduling and Conference Play

Beyond individual game cancellations, Sankey also addressed broader trends in college football scheduling. The commissioner noted that some conferences are expanding the number of conference games played each season, moving from eight to nine matches. This change aims to strengthen intra-conference competition and potentially improve playoff positioning. While the SEC hasn't adopted this approach yet, it remains under consideration as part of ongoing discussions within the league.

Sankey explained that the CFP selection process plays a crucial role in shaping these decisions. Teams must weigh the benefits of playing more conference games against the value of challenging non-conference matchups. For instance, increasing the number of conference games can enhance a team's resume for playoff consideration but might reduce opportunities for marquee out-of-conference contests. Sankey emphasized the need to strike a balance between these competing interests, ensuring that both the quality of competition and fan interest are preserved. Ultimately, he hopes that the sport can find a way to maintain exciting rivalries while navigating the complexities of the CFP system.