In the ever-evolving world of automotive design, industry veteran Stevens offers a fresh perspective on the current trends. He argues that the recent focus on aggressive aesthetics and unconventional features stems from brands' desperate attempts to reignite public excitement through innovation. This approach is not necessarily driven by conviction in its effectiveness but rather by uncertainty about what steps to take next. Recently collaborating with eBay on a restoration project involving a Mk1 Ford Transit, Stevens reflects on his early days at Ford and the transition from manual clay modeling to computer-aided design (CAD). According to him, this technological shift partly accounts for today's awkward car designs, as CAD tools lack the collaborative potential of traditional methods. Despite his critiques, Stevens acknowledges a liking for small electric vehicles and emphasizes the growing importance of design as cars increasingly share platforms.

Stevens recently completed an intriguing collaboration with eBay, where he designed and oversaw the restoration of a classic Mk1 Ford Transit. All replacement components were sourced exclusively from eBay Motors, showcasing both his adaptability and deep-rooted expertise. Reflecting on his career beginnings in the 1970s at Ford, Stevens reminisces about the era when clay modeling was the primary method for shaping vehicle designs. Those days fostered a collaborative environment where multiple designers could physically interact with the evolving model, offering immediate feedback and ensuring practicality in every curve and line.

Today, the landscape has dramatically shifted with the widespread adoption of CAD technology. Stevens expresses concerns over the limitations of these digital tools, arguing that they fail to replicate the collaborative atmosphere once inherent in clay modeling. In the past, skilled clay modellists played a crucial role in identifying impractical design elements, thus preventing costly mistakes. The tactile nature of working with clay facilitated a deeper understanding of how various design elements would function in real-world scenarios, something CAD struggles to fully capture.

Despite his reservations, Stevens clarifies that his criticisms are not rooted in nostalgia or opposition to modern advancements such as electric vehicles (EVs). He appreciates the concept of compact EVs but warns of the challenges arising as cars increasingly share platforms. With sensory elements gradually fading into obscurity, design becomes the sole distinguishing factor among vehicles. Consequently, the visual appeal of a car gains unprecedented importance, posing significant challenges and opportunities for future automotive designers.

As the automotive industry continues to evolve, Stevens' insights provide valuable guidance. His experiences highlight the need for a balanced approach, leveraging both traditional wisdom and cutting-edge technology. By recognizing the strengths and limitations of each method, the industry can strive towards creating designs that resonate with consumers while maintaining practicality and aesthetic appeal. Ultimately, the future of automotive design lies in harmoniously blending innovation with time-honored craftsmanship.