Music artist William Leonard Roberts, better known as Rick Ross, is currently embroiled in two significant legal disputes. One involves an outstanding tax liability with the State of Georgia, while the other centers around a lawsuit filed by a paraplegic attendee of his car show event. Both cases highlight the complexities of financial obligations and accessibility concerns within the entertainment industry.

Tax Troubles for Music Mogul

The Georgia Department of Revenue has taken legal action against the rapper for unpaid taxes. According to court documents, Ross owes a considerable sum that has escalated over time due to interest and penalties. This issue underscores the importance of staying current with tax payments and highlights the potential consequences of neglecting such responsibilities.

The musician's tax debt began with an initial amount of nearly $30,000 from 2021 but has ballooned to over $64,000 due to additional charges. The state tax execution filed against him details the breakdown of this debt, including interest, penalties, and collection fees. Despite owning properties in both Georgia and Florida, no resolution has been reached yet. The lien lists a Florida address for Ross, raising questions about his residency status and its implications on his tax liabilities.

Accessibility Issues at Car Show Event

In a separate but equally significant matter, Ross faces a lawsuit brought by a paraplegic man named Darris Straughter. The plaintiff claims he was misled about the accessibility of the rapper's car show event, which caused him considerable inconvenience and distress. This case brings attention to the need for clear communication and proper accommodations for individuals with disabilities.

Darris had planned his attendance meticulously, even selling his car to finance the trip. Upon arrival, however, he found that the event lacked wheelchair-accessible shuttles and other necessary facilities. He spent hours waiting under the summer sun while other attendees were transported smoothly. Ross and his company have contested the lawsuit, arguing that Darris did not have a formal contract and that he had previously attended without issues. The ongoing case emphasizes the importance of ensuring inclusivity and addressing the needs of all attendees in future events.