Investors considering diversified bond funds may want to reconsider PIMCO Commodity Real Retail Strategy A (PCRAX) at this juncture. This fund, managed by the PIMCO Funds family, has garnered a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), indicating it might not be the best choice for potential investors. The fund's performance over various time frames and its cost structure are critical factors that influence this assessment. Despite offering exposure to high-quality bonds, PCRAX's higher expense ratio and moderate returns make it less attractive compared to its peers in the diversified bonds category.
The performance metrics of PCRAX reveal both strengths and weaknesses. Over the past five years, the fund has achieved an annualized total return of 6.76%, placing it in the middle third among its peers. However, its three-year annualized return of 1.32% is notably lower, situating it in the bottom third during this period. These figures highlight the variability in the fund's performance across different time horizons.
Moreover, the volatility of PCRAX is another significant consideration. The standard deviation over the past three years stands at 16.35%, exceeding the category average of 14.43%. Over five years, the standard deviation escalates to 18.61%, significantly higher than the category average of 15.57%. This increased volatility suggests that the fund experiences greater fluctuations in value compared to its counterparts, which could be a concern for risk-averse investors. Additionally, the fund's beta of -1.04 indicates that it tends to move inversely to the broader fixed-income market, adding another layer of complexity to its performance evaluation.
When assessing PCRAX, the cost structure plays a crucial role in determining its attractiveness. As a load fund, PCRAX comes with an expense ratio of 1.36%, which is notably higher than the category average of 0.96%. This higher expense ratio can erode returns over time, making it less competitive against similar funds with lower fees. Furthermore, the minimum initial investment requirement of $1,000 and subsequent investments of at least $50 add to the considerations for potential investors.
Investment advisors' fees have not been factored into the performance metrics provided, which means that actual returns could be even lower if these costs were included. Given the competitive landscape of mutual fund investing, where cost efficiency is increasingly vital, PCRAX's higher expenses could be a deterrent for many investors. Moreover, the fund's Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell) underscores concerns about its overall suitability as an investment option. Investors seeking diversified bond exposure might find better alternatives within the category that offer comparable or superior performance at a lower cost.