Customer Satisfaction in Dining: Quick Service vs Full-Service

Jun 18, 2025 at 11:00 AM
Slide 4
Slide 1
Slide 2
Slide 3
Slide 4
Slide 1

In a recent study conducted by the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ASCI), the dining industry's performance was evaluated, highlighting key players in both quick-service and full-service sectors. The report revealed steady satisfaction levels among fast-food establishments, with Chick-fil-A leading the pack at an impressive score of 83 out of 100. Meanwhile, Starbucks and Panda Express tied for second place, showing notable improvements year-over-year. On the other hand, McDonald’s faced challenges, scoring just 70. In the realm of full-service dining, Texas Roadhouse maintained its top position despite a slight decline. The ASCI also noted shifts in customer preferences towards smaller food delivery services over larger platforms like Uber Eats.

A Deeper Dive into Restaurant Satisfaction Scores

In the vibrant landscape of American dining options, consumer preferences play a crucial role in shaping brand loyalty. According to the ASCI Restaurant and Food Delivery Study 2025, quick-service restaurants generally retained their appeal, maintaining a consistent satisfaction level of 79 out of 100. Among these chains, Chick-fil-A stood out with an exceptional score of 83, marking its eleventh consecutive year atop the rankings. Competitors such as Panda Express and Starbucks closely followed, achieving scores of 80 each, with Starbucks showcasing a significant 4% increase from the previous year. Conversely, McDonald’s struggled, dropping slightly to a score of 70, possibly due to evolving customer expectations.

Turning attention to full-service dining, overall satisfaction slipped slightly to 82, reflecting concerns about perceived value and delivery experiences. Despite this, Texas Roadhouse secured the highest rating among sit-down restaurants with a score of 84, albeit experiencing a minor dip compared to last year. LongHorn Steakhouse placed second with a score of 83, while Olive Garden scored 81. Smaller brands like Applebee’s and Cracker Barrel achieved respectable scores of 80.

Regarding food delivery services, smaller local providers demonstrated higher satisfaction rates than giants like DoorDash and Grubhub, scoring 77 versus 72 and 69 respectively. This indicates that personalized service and pricing fairness are increasingly valued by customers.

From a journalistic perspective, this study underscores the importance of adaptability in today’s competitive market. As economic uncertainties influence spending habits, restaurants must innovate without compromising quality or consistency. Brands that successfully navigate shifting consumer tastes and technological advancements will undoubtedly thrive. For readers, it serves as a reminder of the power of customer feedback in driving business evolution, emphasizing the need for continuous improvement and responsiveness to changing demands.