In a surprising development, the upcoming Battlefield title will integrate two distinct weapon rulesets: a classic 'closed' system, where weapon availability is tied to specific classes, and an 'open' system, enabling any class to wield any firearm. This dual offering emerged from observations during the beta phase, where initial plans for an 'open' weapon philosophy faced scrutiny. Developers have now committed to supporting both styles from day one, ensuring a comprehensive combat experience.
Addressing community concerns, the development team has affirmed that both the traditional and the unrestricted weapon playlists are integral features, not mere experimental options. This commitment dispels fears among classic Battlefield enthusiasts who worried about the long-term viability of the class-based weapon restrictions. The developers aim to equally foster both playstyles, promising continuous support for each.
Despite assurances, a closer look reveals that the 'closed' weapon mode is categorized as a \"Community Experience\" within Battlefield's Portal feature. While this might suggest a lesser emphasis compared to the 'open' system, developers stress that it is a fully supported mode. The distinction lies in its accessibility and potential for community-driven customization, offering a dedicated space for those who prefer the classic class-weapon synergy.
The core motivation behind the 'open' weapon system is to empower players with greater strategic choice. Developers envision scenarios where a player might select a reconnaissance class for its unique information-gathering abilities but opt for a submachine gun on a smaller map for close-quarters combat, departing from the traditional sniper rifle. This flexibility is designed to enhance tactical depth and allow for more dynamic gameplay adaptations based on mission objectives and environmental factors.
Developers have openly acknowledged feedback regarding the potential dilution of class identity under the 'open' weapon system. Their solution is to offer players the ultimate choice, allowing them to decide whether to embrace the freedom of weapon selection or adhere to the more structured, class-specific loadouts. This player-centric approach aims to mitigate concerns while still pushing the boundaries of traditional Battlefield gameplay. Ultimately, while the 'open' system appears to be the forward-looking default, the inclusion of the 'closed' system provides a welcomed alternative for purists.