Haines/Deishú: A Crossroads of Cultures and Civic Decisions
The town of Haines, Alaska, is grappling with a complex issue that touches on its history, identity, and future. The debate over the potential renaming of the town to "Deishú" has reignited, with the local government exploring ways to acknowledge the region's indigenous roots. Meanwhile, the introduction of a new passenger head tax at the port has raised questions about how the revenue will be utilized, particularly in supporting cultural preservation efforts. As the community navigates these challenges, the path forward promises to be a delicate balance between honoring the past and shaping the town's evolving identity.Embracing Deishú: Reclaiming the Town's Indigenous Heritage
Exploring the Dual Identity of Haines/Deishú
The town of Haines, nestled in the heart of Alaska's stunning natural landscape, has long been known for its rich history and diverse cultural influences. However, the recent discussions surrounding the potential renaming of the town to "Deishú" have brought to the forefront the complex relationship between the town's current identity and its indigenous roots.Deishú, which means "the Beginning or the End of the Trail" in the Tlingit language, holds deep significance for the region's indigenous people. The proposal to incorporate this name alongside or in place of "Haines" has sparked a lively debate within the community, with some residents advocating for a more prominent acknowledgment of the town's indigenous heritage.Honoring the Past, Shaping the Future
The borough's decision to place "Deishú" in parentheses under the "Welcome to Haines" signs is a symbolic step towards recognizing the town's dual identity. However, the recent confiscation and subsequent return of the carved "Deishú" signs has highlighted the ongoing tensions and the desire for a more meaningful integration of the town's indigenous roots.NoowKaKáawu – David Albert Strong Jr., of Klukwan, has advocated for the assembly to consider placing "Deishú" above the word "Haines" on the signs, emphasizing the historical significance of the Tlingit name. This proposal reflects a growing sentiment among some community members to elevate the prominence of the indigenous identity and acknowledge the fact that "Haines is the Johnny Come Lately compared to the longer history of what is Deishú and Jilkáat Aani."As the assembly deliberates on the wording and placement of the signs, the community is engaged in a deeper conversation about the town's identity and the need to strike a balance between honoring the past and shaping the future.Navigating the Complexities of Cultural Representation
The discussion around the town's name and signage is not merely a symbolic exercise; it reflects the broader challenges of cultural representation and the need for meaningful dialogue and collaboration between the local government and the indigenous community.The assembly's decision to send the issue of wording on the signs to its government affairs and services committee underscores the importance of a thoughtful and inclusive approach to addressing these complex matters. By involving various stakeholders, including the Chilkat Indian Village tribal council, the community can work towards a solution that respects the town's history, acknowledges its indigenous heritage, and sets the stage for a more inclusive and equitable future.Preserving Cultural Identity through Civic Engagement
The debate over the town's name and signage is just one aspect of the broader efforts to preserve the cultural identity of Haines/Deishú. As the community grapples with these issues, it is crucial that the local government and the indigenous community continue to engage in open and transparent dialogue, fostering a collaborative approach to decision-making.By actively involving the community in the process, the assembly can ensure that the voices of all stakeholders are heard and that the final outcome reflects the shared values and aspirations of the town. This level of civic engagement not only strengthens the community's sense of ownership but also lays the foundation for a more inclusive and culturally-sensitive future.Funding Cultural Preservation: The Port Head Tax Dilemma
Balancing Economic Needs and Cultural Priorities
Alongside the discussions surrounding the town's identity, the assembly has also grappled with the introduction of a new port terminal tariff, or per-passenger head tax, aimed at offsetting the borough's costs in maintaining and improving its port facilities.The initial proposal included a provision that would have allocated a portion of the revenue towards cultural preservation efforts, reflecting the community's recognition of the importance of safeguarding its indigenous heritage. However, this language was subsequently removed from the final measure, raising concerns among some assembly members about the potential loss of this valuable funding stream.Navigating the Legal Landscape of Cultural Funding
The decision to remove the cultural preservation component from the head tax ordinance was reportedly based on concerns about the legality of such a provision. While global tourism experts have indicated that there are legal ways to establish such a program, the assembly's caution in this matter underscores the need for a thorough understanding of the regulatory landscape and the potential pitfalls that may arise.Assembly member Kevin Forster expressed his disappointment with the removal of the cultural preservation language, emphasizing the importance of not losing sight of this valuable initiative. His comments highlight the delicate balance that the local government must strike between addressing the practical needs of the port infrastructure and ensuring that the community's cultural heritage is adequately supported and preserved.Reviving the Cultural Preservation Agenda
Despite the initial setback, the assembly has signaled its commitment to revisiting the issue of cultural preservation funding. Assembly member Gabe Thomas acknowledged that the cultural head tax fee has not been lost, but rather that the focus was on getting the actual port tariff passed, with the intention of discussing the disbursement of funds at a later stage.This approach suggests a willingness on the part of the assembly to explore alternative avenues for supporting cultural preservation efforts, potentially through the newly established port head tax or other revenue streams. By maintaining this focus, the community can work towards a solution that balances the economic needs of the port with the imperative to safeguard the town's rich cultural heritage.Fostering Collaboration and Transparency
As the assembly navigates the complexities of the port head tax and its potential impact on cultural preservation, it is crucial that the local government continues to engage with the community in a transparent and collaborative manner. By involving stakeholders, including the Chilkoot Indian Association and other indigenous groups, the assembly can ensure that the final decision reflects the community's shared values and priorities.Moreover, the feedback from the fire chief, Brian Clay, underscores the importance of effective communication and coordination between the various municipal departments and the assembly. By fostering a culture of transparency and open dialogue, the local government can better anticipate and address the operational challenges that may arise from any changes to the existing policies and regulations.Addressing Burning Issues: Revamping the Burn Permit System
Balancing Residents' Concerns and Public Safety
In addition to the discussions surrounding the town's identity and the port head tax, the assembly has also turned its attention to the borough's burn permit code, responding to the concerns raised by local residents about the impact of uncontrolled burning on their quality of life and public health.The decision to ask the public safety advisory council to review the burn permit code reflects the assembly's recognition of the need to address the longstanding issues that have been plaguing the community. Residents like Chuck Hollenbeck and Dawn Woodard have voiced their frustrations with the current system, which they claim has enabled their neighbors to engage in prolonged and disruptive burning activities, negatively impacting their ability to enjoy their own properties and maintain their health.Balancing Regulatory Oversight and Enforcement Challenges
The feedback from Fire Chief Brian Clay underscores the complexities involved in revamping the burn permit system. While the chief acknowledged the need for changes to the existing code, he also highlighted the importance of addressing the underlying process-related issues that have contributed to the current challenges.Clay's comments about the lack of communication between the assembly and the fire department, as well as the need to involve multiple stakeholders, including federal and state foresters, the Haines and Klehini Valley fire departments, and Klukwan, emphasize the need for a comprehensive and collaborative approach to addressing the burn permit issue.Empowering the Fire Department for Effective Enforcement
Furthermore, the fire chief's remarks about the limitations in his own enforcement capabilities, such as the inability to write citations or revoke permits, underscore the need for the assembly to carefully consider the practical implications of any changes to the burn permit code.By addressing these enforcement challenges and ensuring that the fire department is equipped with the necessary authority and resources, the assembly can create a more effective and responsive system that can address the concerns of residents while upholding public safety standards.Balancing Competing Interests and Priorities
The review of the burn permit code represents another facet of the broader challenges facing the Haines/Deishú community. As the assembly navigates this issue, it must carefully balance the competing interests and priorities of the residents, the fire department, and other stakeholders to develop a solution that is both practical and responsive to the community's needs.This process of balancing diverse perspectives and finding common ground is essential to the town's overall well-being and its ability to address the complex issues that arise at the intersection of civic governance, public safety, and community well-being.Clearing the Clutter: Revamping the Junk Car Removal Program
Addressing the Accumulation of Abandoned Vehicles
Alongside the discussions surrounding the town's identity, the port head tax, and the burn permit system, the Haines/Deishú community has also grappled with the issue of junk car removal. The borough's efforts to address the accumulation of abandoned vehicles in the area have faced some challenges, with the initial program failing to meet the desired level of participation.As Mayor Tom Morphet reported, despite the October 18th deadline, only 60 cars had been brought in under the program, with 21 of them coming from the Chilkoot Indian Association, which handles the towing and potentially pays the associated fees.Removing Barriers to Participation
In response to the slow progress of the junk car removal program, the assembly has taken steps to address the barriers that may have hindered participation. By removing the disposal fees for regular and medium-sized cars, the assembly has aimed to make the program more accessible and appealing to residents who may have been deterred by the financial burden.Additionally, the assembly has tasked Alekka Fullerton, the contract administrator for the program, to provide recommendations to the borough manager for changing the parameters of the program. This could potentially include measures to assist residents with the towing of their junk vehicles, further reducing the obstacles to participation.Fostering Community Engagement and Ownership
The junk car removal program is not merely a logistical challenge; it also represents an opportunity for the Haines/Deishú community to come together and address a shared issue. By actively involving residents and stakeholders in the process of revamping the program, the local government can foster a sense of community ownership and engagement, ultimately leading to a more effective and sustainable solution.As the assembly continues to refine the junk car removal program, it is crucial that they maintain a collaborative approach, seeking input from the community and addressing the unique needs and concerns of the residents. This holistic approach can help ensure that the program is tailored to the specific circumstances of the Haines/Deishú community, ultimately leading to a more successful and impactful outcome.
