The recent hiring cycle for NFL head coaches has sparked significant discussion. Most teams made logical choices, with the notable exception of the Dallas Cowboys. Evaluating these hires based on experience and potential impact reveals a mix of promising and questionable selections. Here’s a closer look at how each team fared in their coaching appointments, from the uninspiring choice in Dallas to the strategic moves by other franchises.
In the heart of the football season, the Dallas Cowboys opted for Brian Schottenheimer as their new head coach. This decision came as a surprise to many, especially considering the initial expectations for a high-profile hire like Deion Sanders or Bill Belichick. However, Jerry Jones chose familiarity over flash, selecting someone he trusted and knew well. Schottenheimer brings extensive experience as an assistant coach and a deep understanding of the Cowboys' system. Despite this, the selection feels somewhat uninspired, given that Schottenheimer was not a play-calling offensive coordinator for a coach the Cowboys were eager to retain. While it could turn out well, the fan base is already expressing dissatisfaction, wary of the new coach's ability to meet expectations.
The Jacksonville Jaguars’ appointment of Liam Coen as head coach was marked by controversy. Coen initially agreed to return to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers but changed his mind after secret meetings with the Jaguars. This messy process raised questions about both parties' integrity. Nonetheless, Coen’s impressive performance as the Buccaneers' offensive coordinator in the previous season made him a desirable candidate. With only two seasons of NFL experience as an offensive coordinator, Coen’s success as a head coach remains uncertain. The Jaguars hope his talent can translate into leadership, despite the unconventional path to securing him.
The Las Vegas Raiders turned to Pete Carroll, a seasoned coach with a Super Bowl victory under his belt. At 73, Carroll is set to become the oldest head coach in NFL history when the season begins. His track record is impeccable, boasting a winning record in most of his years with the Seattle Seahawks. Yet, concerns linger about his ability to manage a rebuilding team at this stage of his career. Historically, few coaches have succeeded past their 70s, but Carroll’s energy and expertise might prove otherwise. For the Raiders, this hire represents a gamble on experience and reputation.
The New York Jets, known for their organizational dysfunction, surprisingly secured Aaron Glenn as their new head coach. Glenn’s defensive background and respect within the league make him a strong candidate to lead the struggling team. Facing challenges such as a messy quarterback situation and a roster in need of a reset, Glenn’s task is daunting. Yet, his qualities as a respected leader offer hope that he can navigate these obstacles and bring stability to the Jets.
The Chicago Bears appointed Ben Johnson, an offensive mastermind, as their new head coach. Johnson’s reputation as an expert play-caller makes him a promising choice for a franchise in dire need of a breakthrough. While his transition from coordinator to head coach is untested, his innovative approach to offense could be exactly what the Bears need. Fans are optimistic, hoping Johnson will replicate the success of coaches like Sean McVay. Only time will tell if he can handle the broader responsibilities of leading a team.
The New England Patriots’ selection of Mike Vrabel stands out as a strategic move. Vrabel, a former Patriots linebacker, returns to the organization with a proven track record as head coach of the Tennessee Titans. Despite the Titans’ internal struggles, Vrabel’s success and long-standing relationship with the Patriots suggest he will receive the support needed to rebuild the team. Although the Patriots’ handling of the coaching search drew criticism, landing Vrabel ensures they have a competent leader in place.
From a journalistic perspective, these hires highlight the complex balance between experience, potential, and organizational dynamics. Each team’s choice reflects different priorities and risks. Ultimately, the success of these new coaches will depend on their ability to adapt and lead their respective teams through challenging times. Time will reveal whether these decisions were wise investments or risky gambles.