Affordability Challenges Persist in US Housing Market Despite Relatively Lower Prices in Pittsburgh and Cleveland

A recent comprehensive analysis of global housing markets reveals a concerning trend: no major metropolitan area, despite regional variations, genuinely qualifies as affordable. While cities like Pittsburgh and Cleveland stand out in the United States for their comparatively lower housing costs, the broader picture indicates a significant challenge for prospective homeowners. This examination, based on a median home price to median household income ratio, brings to light the underlying economic pressures influencing housing accessibility and the varied experiences within different regions.

The annual Demographia International Housing Affordability report, compiled by Chapman University, provides a critical assessment of housing accessibility across 95 global markets. This report employs a straightforward metric: the ratio of median home prices to median household incomes. A score of 3.0 or below typically signifies an affordable market. In the latest findings, Pittsburgh maintained its position as the most affordable U.S. major metro for the fifth consecutive year, registering a score of 3.2. Cleveland followed closely with a score of 3.3. Other U.S. cities recognized for their relative affordability include St. Louis, Rochester, N.Y., and Oklahoma City. However, the striking revelation is that not a single metro area worldwide managed to achieve a score of 3.0 or less, indicating a pervasive lack of true housing affordability on a global scale.

Delving deeper into the local dynamics, real estate professionals in both Pittsburgh and Cleveland corroborate these findings. Dale Swanton, a Realtor with RE/MAX Select Realty in Pittsburgh, and Amanda Pohlman, a broker at KW Living in Cleveland and leader of The Pohlman Team, affirm that the report accurately reflects their daily experiences in these markets. Current data indicates similar median home prices in both cities, with Cleveland at $249,000 and Pittsburgh at $249,900. This contrasts sharply with coastal markets such as San Francisco, where median prices hover around $1.2 million, and Los Angeles, at $1.5 million. The significant disparity means that a homebuyer could acquire nearly six properties in Pittsburgh or Cleveland for the cost of one in San Francisco.

Pittsburgh's housing market has historically exhibited a pattern of stable, measured growth, contrasting with the more volatile booms and busts seen in other parts of the country. This steady appreciation meant that even during the 2008 housing crisis, Pittsburgh experienced minimal price depreciation, distinguishing it from most other major metros. While home prices have risen considerably over the past decade, increasing by 40% to 50%, this growth is modest when compared to the 100% or greater surges observed elsewhere. Despite its relative affordability, the market still falls short of the true affordability benchmark, largely due to persistent inventory shortages. Experts suggest that increasing the availability of housing units, particularly through new construction, is crucial for enhancing affordability in a broader sense.

Cleveland's market, similarly, has long been recognized for its affordability and abundant opportunities. However, the recent escalation of prices in other major U.S. cities has drawn increased attention to Cleveland's value proposition. The median sales price in the Akron Cleveland Association of Realtors region is approximately $260,000, which remains significantly lower than in many other metropolitan areas across the nation. Over the past five years, some neighborhoods in Cleveland have witnessed remarkable property appreciation, with values soaring by as much as 50% to 60%. Despite this substantial growth, homeownership in Cleveland remains within reach for many families, offering a viable alternative to highly priced markets like Austin, New York, or Los Angeles.

Beyond economic factors, both Pittsburgh and Cleveland offer compelling lifestyle advantages that contribute to their appeal. Cleveland, for instance, boasts a stable climate, largely free from the extreme weather events like tornadoes and wildfires that plague other regions. Its world-class healthcare system, notably the Cleveland Clinic, and a distinct seasonality that includes pleasant winters, further enhance its desirability. Pittsburgh also attracts businesses, particularly in the tech sector, due to its low cost of living and a robust job market supported by excellent universities. These combined attributes solidify their positions as attractive destinations for both residents and businesses seeking value and quality of life.

The findings from this comprehensive report underscore a critical issue in today's housing landscape: the global scarcity of truly affordable housing. While Pittsburgh and Cleveland offer some of the most accessible markets in the U.S., the underlying economic forces and supply-demand imbalances continue to challenge widespread affordability. Addressing this requires a multi-faceted approach, including increased housing inventory and careful consideration of economic policies that impact median incomes and housing costs. The journey towards achieving genuine housing affordability remains an ongoing challenge for policymakers and communities worldwide.